How many so many would have marked Budimir with the occasions of Mbappé (and vice versa)? A mathematician analyzes it

How many so many would have marked Budimir with the occasions of Mbappé (and vice versa)? A mathematician analyzes it

We love soccer players Compare players. This is what we are going to do here with two of the Spanish league scorers. On the one hand, Kylian Mbappé26 -year -old Real Madrid player and with a market value of 180 million euros. On the other, Ante Budimir33 -year -old Osasuna striker, with a market value of 5 million euros.
In these comparisons we usually use the heart more than something else and we almost always end up defending positions that benefit our team. But football currently has established metrics that allow us to argue and affirm very convinced: “The data says.”

What are the expected goals?

Specifically, a new way of measuring the efficiency of the scorers is to compare their percentiles (goals achieved) in the context of the probabilistic distribution of their occasions (expected goals, XG).

But what are they The expected goals? It is established that the XG value of a penalty in the main European leagues is 0.79, which determines that the probability of getting a goal is equivalent to launch a 100 -sided dice (slut) and obtain a number between 1 and 79. Failing it will therefore will obtain a number between 80 and 100, that is, 21 possibilities of every 100, 0.21.

Large -scale shots group

At present, the expected goals of a team are calculated by adding the XG values ​​of all its shots. In this way their average values ​​or hopes are obtained with two decimals. These values ​​are compared to the goals achieved, which are whole numbers, to conclude What team has had more luck or success.

Well, using the same metric we can exchange (virtually) players between teams. If we choose Kylian Mbappé and against Budimir, first and third scorer of the current Spanish League, we can group their corresponding shots and XG to calculate the individual probabilities of each number of goals. Thus we can compare goals (expected) with goals (achieved) in its same units.

This value will give us the efficiency of each one, which we will transport to the occasions of the other to be able to answer the question that gives title to this article. But not with average values, as is usually done, but each with the distribution of their occasions.

We calculate the probability that the shots recorded in the competition become a certain number of goals (0, 1, 2 …). With two occasions it seems simple and is calculated very easy, but if the number increases, it is more complicated.

For example, if we have 5 shots, the probability of putting 3 has to combine all shots in groups of 3 successful and 2 failed, which grows very markedly. In the case at hand, we have 161 shots of one and 99 of the other, which makes the intractable problem if we need to calculate all combinations and calculate its results.

What is the convolution?

To be able to handle it computationally we use the concept of Convolution. In summary, the shots are computed successively. For each shot, the number of potential goals increases by one and the probabilities calculated so far are modified depending on whether the shot we are adding is goal or not.

The accumulated probability function assigns a value to its percentile range, which consists of a position of position that divides a distribution into 100 equal parts, indicating the percentage of data that are below that value.

ABATITTO PERCENTILES ON YOUR TEAM

From the total of 161 shots thrown by Kylian Mbappé, it is very unlikely to get 161 goals, but not impossible. Therefore its probability is not zero. The same goes for 99 Budimir shots. We obtain for each number of possible goals its probability, which accumulates in such a way that the Mbappé percentile with respect to its goal distribution is obtained by adding the chances of getting from 0 to their 31 goals. This gives us a value of 0.91. Therefore, we establish the 91th percentile.

For Budimir we do it with its 21 goals resulting in a value of 0.83, Percentil 83. We can therefore conclude that the efficiency of both is very high but with differences that we will translate into goals exchanging the scenarios.

Budimir at Real Madrid, Mbappé in Osasuna

The graph shows the goals and their probabilities. We see that the campana Budimir is more picuda than Mbappé’s and that this is wider at the base, because the former has less dispersion in the quality of his occasions.

Attending to this, if the Frenchman had played in Osasuna, he would have achieved an additional goal, 22 (21). If the Croatian had dressed in white, he would have achieved two less goals, 29 (31). This exchanged calculation is done in reverse, seeing how many goals cover the percentiles of each player in the distribution of the occasions of the other.

Although there are aspects in the assessment of soccer players that we are not considering, at least we have managed to dress Mbappé de Rojillo and Merengue Budimir, evaluating the most important thing about the performance of their positions: the goals.

Only two goals distance the performance of both if we had exchanged them. There are rumors that suggest that Croatian can wear white next season. Our study has advanced how many goals would have achieved if you have done so during the concluded season.

If we were the sports director of the club, we could not advise their hiring. Its efficiency is high and promises to continue being in the next seasons, whether “red” or with another shirt.

(Tagstotranslate) so many

Previous Post Next Post